0.05/0.14	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.05/0.14	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.10/0.35	% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
0.10/0.35	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.35	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.35	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.35	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.35	% CPULimit   : 1440
0.10/0.35	% WCLimit    : 180
0.10/0.35	% DateTime   : Thu Jul  4 08:49:39 EDT 2024
0.10/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.48	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.16/0.49	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.y6IS5VPXyr/E---3.1_19774.p
789.94/100.11	# Version: 3.2.0-ho
789.94/100.11	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
789.94/100.11	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting new_ho_8 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# post_as_ho1 with pid 19855 completed with status 0
789.94/100.11	# Result found by post_as_ho1
789.94/100.11	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
789.94/100.11	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# No SInE strategy applied
789.94/100.11	# Search class: HGHPM-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
789.94/100.11	# partial match(2): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
789.94/100.11	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
789.94/100.11	# Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# sh3 with pid 19863 completed with status 7
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 19s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# post_as_ho1 with pid 21454 completed with status 0
789.94/100.11	# Result found by post_as_ho1
789.94/100.11	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
789.94/100.11	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting new_bool_9 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# No SInE strategy applied
789.94/100.11	# Search class: HGHPM-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
789.94/100.11	# partial match(2): HGHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
789.94/100.11	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
789.94/100.11	# Starting sh3 with 98s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# sh3 with pid 19863 completed with status 7
789.94/100.11	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 19s (1) cores
789.94/100.11	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
789.94/100.11	# Presaturation interreduction done
789.94/100.11	
789.94/100.11	# Proof found!
789.94/100.11	# SZS status Theorem
789.94/100.11	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_22, type, esk1_0: a > a > a).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_23, type, esk2_0: a > a > a).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_24, type, esk3_0: a).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_25, type, esk4_0: a).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_26, type, esk5_0: a).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_27, type, esk6_0: a).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_28, type, esk7_0: a).
789.94/100.11	thf(decl_29, type, esk8_0: a).
789.94/100.11	thf(cDISTRIB_THM_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a > a, X2:a > a > a]:(((((((((![X3:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3)))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X1 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X1 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X2 @ X3 @ (X2 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4)=(X1 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(X2 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3))))=>(![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ (X2 @ X4 @ X5))=(X2 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ (X1 @ X3 @ X5))))<=>![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5))=(X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ (X2 @ X3 @ X5))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.y6IS5VPXyr/E---3.1_19774.p', cDISTRIB_THM_pme)).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a > a, X2:a > a > a]:(((((((((![X3:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3)))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X1 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X1 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(X2 @ X3 @ (X2 @ X4 @ X5)))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ X4)=(X1 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))))&![X3:a, X4:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(X2 @ X4 @ X3))))&![X3:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3))))=>(![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X1 @ X3 @ (X2 @ X4 @ X5))=(X2 @ (X1 @ X3 @ X4) @ (X1 @ X3 @ X5))))<=>![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((X2 @ X3 @ (X1 @ X4 @ X5))=(X1 @ (X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ (X2 @ X3 @ X5)))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cDISTRIB_THM_pme])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X32:a, X33:a, X34:a, X35:a, X36:a, X37:a, X38:a, X39:a, X40:a, X41:a, X42:a, X43:a, X44:a, X45:a, X46:a, X47:a, X54:a, X55:a, X56:a, X57:a, X58:a, X59:a]:(((((((((((esk1_0 @ X32 @ X32)=(X32))&((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X33 @ X34) @ X35)=(esk1_0 @ X33 @ (esk1_0 @ X34 @ X35))))&((esk2_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X36 @ X37) @ X38)=(esk2_0 @ X36 @ (esk2_0 @ X37 @ X38))))&((esk1_0 @ X39 @ X40)=(esk1_0 @ X40 @ X39)))&((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X41 @ X42) @ X42)=(X42)))&((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X43 @ X44) @ X44)=(X44)))&((esk2_0 @ X45 @ X46)=(esk2_0 @ X46 @ X45)))&((esk2_0 @ X47 @ X47)=(X47)))&((((esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))!=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0)))|((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk8_0))!=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0) @ (esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0))))&(((esk1_0 @ X54 @ (esk2_0 @ X55 @ X56))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X54 @ X55) @ (esk1_0 @ X54 @ X56)))|((esk2_0 @ X57 @ (esk1_0 @ X58 @ X59))=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X57 @ X58) @ (esk2_0 @ X57 @ X59))))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a, X8:a, X9:a, X10:a]:((((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5)))|((esk2_0 @ X8 @ (esk1_0 @ X9 @ X10))=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X8 @ X9) @ (esk2_0 @ X8 @ X10))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4))=(esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))=(X3))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5, c_0_6])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a]:(((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)=(X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (((esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))!=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0)))|((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk8_0))!=(esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0) @ (esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk8_0)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a, X8:a, X9:a, X10:a]:((((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5)))|((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X8 @ X9) @ (esk2_0 @ X8 @ X10))=(esk2_0 @ X8 @ (esk1_0 @ X9 @ X10))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_8])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X5:a, X4:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ (esk2_0 @ X5 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4))))=(esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_3])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk2_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ X3)=(X3))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3))=(X3))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:((((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5)))|((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0))!=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a, X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ (esk2_0 @ X5 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3))))=(esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_6])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4))=(X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_6])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:((((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3) @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5)))|((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0))!=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4))=(X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_11])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a, X8:a, X9:a, X10:a]:((((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)))|((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X8 @ X9) @ (esk1_0 @ X8 @ X10))=(esk1_0 @ X8 @ (esk2_0 @ X9 @ X10))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7, c_0_20])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X5:a, X4:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ X5 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_15])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X5:a, X4:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_21])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23]), c_0_24])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a, X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3) @ X5)))=(esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26]), c_0_11])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_21])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_31, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3) @ X5))=(esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_9])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_32, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X5:a, X4:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5)))=(esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30, c_0_11])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_23]), c_0_15])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a, X8:a, X10:a, X9:a]:((((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5))=(esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5)))|((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X8 @ X9) @ (esk1_0 @ X8 @ X10))=(esk1_0 @ X8 @ (esk2_0 @ X10 @ X9))))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_7]), c_0_32])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk1_0 @ X4 @ X3))), c_0_6).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4)=(esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))), c_0_11).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), c_0_3).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk2_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ X5)=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), c_0_15).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ![X5:a, X4:a, X3:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ X5 @ X3)))=(X3))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_3])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a]:(((esk1_0 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_33])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, (((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk4_0) @ (esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ esk5_0))!=(esk1_0 @ esk3_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0)))|((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)))!=(esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk8_0)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_27]), c_0_6])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X5:a, X4:a]:(((esk2_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ X3 @ X5))=(esk1_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X5 @ X4)))), inference(ar,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]), c_0_35, c_0_36, c_0_37, c_0_38])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X5:a, X4:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ X5 @ (esk2_0 @ X4 @ X3))))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ X4))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40]), c_0_15])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ((esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk8_0 @ (esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ esk7_0)))!=(esk2_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk1_0 @ esk7_0 @ esk8_0))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_42]), c_0_11])])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a, X4:a, X5:a]:(((esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ (esk2_0 @ X3 @ X5)))=(esk2_0 @ X3 @ (esk1_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_42]), c_0_15]), c_0_30]), c_0_42]), c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
789.94/100.11	thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_45]), c_0_6])]), ['proof']).
789.94/100.11	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
789.94/100.11	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
789.94/100.11	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
789.94/100.11	# Initial clauses                      : 11
789.94/100.11	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
789.94/100.11	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
789.94/100.11	# Processed clauses                    : 1405
789.94/100.11	# ...of these trivial                  : 498
789.94/100.11	# ...subsumed                          : 716
789.94/100.11	# ...remaining for further processing  : 191
789.94/100.11	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
789.94/100.11	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
789.94/100.11	# Backward-subsumed                    : 17
789.94/100.11	# Backward-rewritten                   : 74
789.94/100.11	# Generated clauses                    : 44283
789.94/100.11	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 34011
789.94/100.11	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
789.94/100.11	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
789.94/100.11	# Paramodulations                      : 44275
789.94/100.11	# Factorizations                       : 8
789.94/100.11	# NegExts                              : 0
789.94/100.11	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
789.94/100.11	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
789.94/100.11	# Total rewrite steps                  : 63834
789.94/100.11	# ...of those cached                   : 54390
789.94/100.11	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional check models        : 0
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
789.94/100.11	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
789.94/100.11	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
789.94/100.11	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
789.94/100.11	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
789.94/100.11	# Current number of processed clauses  : 90
789.94/100.11	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 65
789.94/100.11	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
789.94/100.11	#    Negative unit clauses             : 0
789.94/100.11	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 16
789.94/100.11	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 32533
789.94/100.11	# ...number of literals in the above   : 66644
789.94/100.11	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
789.94/100.11	# Current number of archived clauses   : 101
789.94/100.11	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1107
789.94/100.11	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1103
789.94/100.11	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 80
789.94/100.11	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1615
789.94/100.11	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
789.94/100.11	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 847
789.94/100.11	# BW rewrite match successes           : 357
789.94/100.11	# Condensation attempts                : 0
789.94/100.11	# Condensation successes               : 0
789.94/100.11	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 669210
789.94/100.11	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 466
789.94/100.11	
789.94/100.11	# -------------------------------------------------
789.94/100.11	# User time                : 97.256 s
789.94/100.11	# System time              : 1.635 s
789.94/100.11	# Total time               : 98.890 s
789.94/100.11	# Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
789.94/100.11	
789.94/100.11	# -------------------------------------------------
789.94/100.11	# User time                : 97.256 s
789.94/100.11	# System time              : 1.640 s
789.94/100.11	# Total time               : 98.896 s
789.94/100.11	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
789.94/100.11	% E---3.1 exiting
789.94/100.11	% E exiting
789.94/100.11	EOF
